Hi! JTK wrote: > > > The footprint will probably not be reduced *much* lower, although > > it does get better with every release. > > No, it doesn't. Since I've been squealing about Mozilla's use of 20MB+ > to display a blank page, do you know where we sit today? Yep: 20MB+ to > display a blank page. Nothing getting better there with each passing > month, let alone every release! The XPConnectifying of the DOM will reduce memory size about 10%. That's not too bad, IMO... Christian
- Looking good - but hope for lower resources/memory? Mark
- Re: Looking good - but hope for lower resources/memo... JTK
- Re: Looking good - but hope for lower resources/memo... Fabian Guisset
- Re: Looking good - but hope for lower resources/... JTK
- Re: Looking good - but hope for lower resour... Christian Mattar
- Re: Looking good - but hope for lower re... Fabian Guisset
- Re: Looking good - but hope for low... Christian Mattar
- Re: Looking good - but hope for lower resources/... Mark
