The doc is super-review centric because I've received a ton of questions
about super-review lately. In trying to answer them, I found that some
explanation of review was necessary to put super-review in perspective.
I agree that more attention to the review process would be helpful,
though I'm not sure when I'll get there ;-)
mitchell
Jonas Sicking wrote:
>(Sorry for replying here, but I'm not sure how many developers read
>moz-general)
>
>The doc is really nice, but why so super-reviewed centered. Question 7-23 is
>just as interesting (if not even more) if super-review is substituted with
>review.
>
>/ Jonas Sicking
>
>
