> 1) Does this correctly account for dups of dups? eg
Yes.
> 2) Couldn't this be accomplished more cleanly by adding a num_dups field
> to the bug itself?
No, because if something is un-dupped you get trouble.
I did think about this quite hard when I implemented it, honest :-)
> possible to add minimum/maximum num_dups to the query page, providing
We already have this. Well, just about.
duplicates.cgi has several parameters:
changedsince - days ago for the "Changed since" column; lets you see
what's been mostdupped recently
maxrows - how many rows you want. If you are sorting by dup count, this
provides "min dup" functionality.
sortby - can be "dup_count", "bug_no" and "delta". Defines the sorting of
the columns.
Gerv
