"Jeffrey W. Baker" wrote: > > A fix was committed for 83401 into the Mozilla tree. I'm looking at the > diffs and it looks like this will prevent Mozilla from contacting an HTTP > server that listens on a well known port other than 80, such as 25 or 389. > What business is it of Mozilla's that my HTTP server is on port 25? > Suppose my secure IMAP server really is on the finger port. I want > Mozilla to work in those cases. If I say the url is > https://www.myhost.com:143/path, I expect Mozilla to go get the URL from > that host, on that port, and using that protocol. I do not expect Mozilla > to drop my request because of an internal blacklist. There seem to be problems with URLs like this: ftp://%0a<SMTP commands here>@host:25 Clarence
Re: More top-secret BS commits with hidden bug reports
Clarence (Andreas M. Schneider) Wed, 06 Jun 2001 09:03:41 -0700
- More top-secret BS commits with hidden bug... Jeffrey W. Baker
- Re: More top-secret BS commits with h... Clarence (Andreas M. Schneider)
- Re: More top-secret BS commits wi... Rip Toren
- Re: More top-secret BS commit... Clarence (Andreas M. Schneider)
- Re: More top-secret BS co... Rip Toren
- Re: More top-secret ... hume . spamfilter
- Re: More top-secret ... Clarence (Andreas M. Schneider)
- Re: More top-sec... Rip Toren
- Re: More top... Stuart Ballard
- Re: More top... Stuart Ballard
- Re: More top... Jeffrey W. Baker
- Re: More top... JTK
