To be blunt, a problems for whom? Mozilla parsing problems, or for the
server working on the other end of the connection?
Clarence (Andreas M. Schneider) wrote:
> "Jeffrey W. Baker" wrote:
>
>>A fix was committed for 83401 into the Mozilla tree. I'm looking at the
>>diffs and it looks like this will prevent Mozilla from contacting an HTTP
>>server that listens on a well known port other than 80, such as 25 or 389.
>> What business is it of Mozilla's that my HTTP server is on port 25?
>> Suppose my secure IMAP server really is on the finger port. I want
>>Mozilla to work in those cases. If I say the url is
>>https://www.myhost.com:143/path, I expect Mozilla to go get the URL from
>>that host, on that port, and using that protocol. I do not expect Mozilla
>>to drop my request because of an internal blacklist.
>>
>
> There seem to be problems with URLs like this:
> ftp://%0a<SMTP commands here>@host:25
>
> Clarence
>