jesus X wrote:
>
> JTK wrote:
> > Um, Rabbi, Netscape has *already* been rendered irrelevant. By itself.
>
> First, I'm not a rabbi.
Jesus was a rabbi. Just a little religious humor for ya there.
> And second, NS is not irrelevant despite it's own
> actions. Ask ten developers of major web site companies if NS is irrelevant.
> They'll say no.
>
Indeed they will. They'll say "God I hate Netscape. It is such a
complete pain in the kiester having to develop web sites that render
properly on NC4.7x (especially since it accounts for such a slim
minority of the people hitting my site)."
> > > No. I won't. I don't like the way they do things, I don't like their
> > > pathetic excuse for security, I don't like having my options narrowed to
> > > one for me. No, I will not "deal with it" nor will I accept it.
> > Then I guess you'll just have to come to terms with being rendered
> > irrelevant by someone who does.
>
> I doubt it. I refuse to have my choices made for me in the arena.
Hehehe, brother, your choices have already been made for you. Who do
you think writes up the "PC'9x" specs that your machine meets?
> I will not
> abide by Microsoft's decisions of what is good for me if I disagree. Flat out.
>
You've chosen a battle that has already been fought and lost by too many
others. And those others were much better equipped than Mozilla to
"kill Micro$oft".
> --
> jesus X [ Booze-fueled paragon of pointless cruelty and wanton sadism. ]
> email [ jesusx @ who.net ]
> web [ http://burntelectrons.com ] [ Updated April 29, 2001 ]
> tag [ The Universe: It's everywhere you want to be. ]
> warning [ All your base are belong to us. ]
