jesus X wrote: > > JTK wrote: > > jesus X wrote: > > > First, the first Netscape is the company, the second is the product. > > But why is it there at all?!?!? <strident> MOZILLA IS NOT NETSCAPE!!! > > THE POLITBURO SEZ SO!!!! <\strident> > > There is no politburo. Mozilla is not Netscape, Yes there is, and yes it is. > but Netscape is the primary > contributor to Mozilla. Pretty much the only contributor. It'd be interesting to see some numbers. > Deal with it. > No, I won't deal with it. I won't have AOL making my choices for me. > -- > jesus X [ Booze-fueled paragon of pointless cruelty and wanton sadism. ] > email [ jesusx @ who.net ] > web [ http://burntelectrons.com ] [ Updated April 29, 2001 ] > tag [ The Universe: It's everywhere you want to be. ] > warning [ All your base are belong to us. ]
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? Mike Koenecke
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? JTK
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? Garth Wallace
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? JTK
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? Garth Wallace
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? JTK
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? jesus X
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? jesus X
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? JTK
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? jesus X
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? JTK
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? jesus X
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? Christian Mattar
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? jesus X
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? Jay Garcia
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? Kevin Berkheiser
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? jesus X
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? Kevin Berkheiser
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? jesus X
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? jesus X
