Garth Wallace wrote: > > JTK wrote: > > > Mike Koenecke wrote: > > > >>It is evident you have nothing > >>productive to contribute to the discussion, and have not for some > >>time. > > > > Well, techinically, you're correct, but only because the Maozilla > > Politburo has no desire to hear about the defects in their 3+-year-old > > web browser and newsreader. > > Bullshit. We hear about them every day in bugzilla, where most of the > problem reports have more useful content than "j00 @11 5uXX0rz". "...still a man hears what he wants to hear, and disregards the rest, mmmm..."
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? Carlfish
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? JTK
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? jesus X
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? Gavin Long
- [Offtopic] Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? Carlfish
- Re: [Offtopic] Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? JTK
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? JTK
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? Mike Koenecke
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? JTK
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? Garth Wallace
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? JTK
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? Garth Wallace
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? JTK
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? jesus X
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? jesus X
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? JTK
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? jesus X
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? JTK
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? jesus X
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? Christian Mattar
- Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5? jesus X
