In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Henno Buschmann wrote:
> Hallo,
> 
> Laurent Granger wrote:
> 
>> http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mozilla.org&doctype=Inline
> yes, its really poor. A Browser community doesn't care on valid HTML.

http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mozilla.org%2F&doctype=
HTML+4.01+Transitional
(URL wrapped)
Notice the new selection list for doctypes at the validator; you need to 
use this when checking a page that doesn't have an HTML doctype inline.
When this is done, the list of errors is reduced to an un-entity-fied 
ampersand.

> 
> I thought that they are forward-looking and use XHTML, but its a bad
> 
> disappointment.
> 

I believe one of the people at Zope is working on a new setup for the 
page; keep an eye on n.p.m.documentation.

-- 
Chris Hoess

Reply via email to