> > Henno Buschmann wrote:
> >
> > Whatever the state of the HTML in the main page, it loads well in
> > browsers.
>
> Yea, in *your* Browser. But whats with palms and all other kind of small
> computers?
Do you know how much testing in how many browsers we put that page
through? No.
> > The fact that the person who wrote the page may know how to
> > read the necessary documentation for what he does and code what he does
> > code is quite a bit more important than details of how he writes HTML at
> > this point.
>
> Valid HTML (or XHTML) doesn't take more time to wrote, than bad HTML.
According to an earlier post, there's one single error when you validate
as 4.01 Transitional. Hardly "bad HTML".
> > The fact is that if you feel the pages are deficient, you should, maybe,
> > raise your arm and offer to fix them? No?
>
> Maybe i will.
When you've finished, please mail the results to me.
Gerv
