And it came to pass that Thomas Betz wrote:
> perhaps I should have wrote that I really think that Mozilla
> is a "ultra-fast-overall-supercool-browser
> "
>:) Sorry for that.
>
> but perhaps somebody else noticed this with webtrends, so
> calm down jahn.
I'm calm, I'm just pointing out that posting an URL makes it
easier to see the site. Without seeing the page, it's all
hypothetical.
HAve you validated the page? Maybe you're mising a few tags.
Here's a good validator:
http://validator.w3.org/
>
> It just loaded that page much slower than IE, that was a
> little strange for me because normally Mozilla displays web
> pages faster than IE.
>
> Yeah I could upload it somewhere, but I have to ask If this
> is a problem if I make the file public, guess this will not
> be a big problem.
>
> till tomorrow...
>
> thomas
>
>
>
> Christopher Jahn wrote:
>
>> And it came to pass that Thomas wrote:
>>
>>
>>>sorry I know stupid subject...
>>>
>>>I have generated a report from webtrends, to be exactly a
>>>"broken link" report. The report is a very big html site
>>>with a big table an a lot of links. Well I thought, "fuck,
>>>this takes way too long to load in IE, let's try my
>>>ultra-fast-overall-supercool-browser Mozilla, with Mozilla
>>>it must display faster!" Bad luck, it takes about 5 times
>>>longer to load the page with moz!!
>>>
>>>I allways thougt Mozilla would be fast what big table/pages
>>>concerns!....(of course, there could be another reason why
>>>moz displays the page so slowly)
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> If you posted an URL so we could look, you'd likely get a
>> worthwhile response.
>>
>> Or we can all make random guesses without any information.
>>
>> Here's mine:
>> "BURMA!"
>>
>>
>
>
--
}:-) Christopher Jahn
{:-( Dionysian Reveler
Hold on to freedom as long as you can, 'cause the girl in your
cell might think she's a man.
To reply: xjahnATyahooDOTcom
