Henri Sivonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As a short-term solution, I suggest that the old doc writing guidelines > be retired and volunteers systematically check out unwrapped documents > from anonymous CVS, fix them to be valid HTML 4.01 and then someone with > CVS check-in access checks them in. I tried but I didn't find the unwrapped documents in CVS. The links are broken :-( To whom should corrected pages be sent? Greeting, Michi -- Beitr�ge zu HTML, CSS und Netzkultur <http://www.subotnik.net/> Zur �bersicht (keine private Seite) <http://michael.nahrath.de/>
- Re: poor HTML on mozilla.org (was: wow) Gervase Markham
- Doctype-Sniffing and poor HTML on mozilla.org (was: p... Michael Nahrath
- Re: Doctype-Sniffing and poor HTML on mozilla.org... Gervase Markham
- Re: Doctype-Sniffing and poor HTML on mozilla... Peter Lairo
- Re: Doctype-Sniffing and poor HTML on moz... Michael Nahrath
- Re: Doctype-Sniffing and poor HTML o... Henri Sivonen
- Re: Doctype-Sniffing and poor HT... Michael Nahrath
- Re: Doctype-Sniffing and poor HT... Henri Sivonen
- Re: Doctype-Sniffing and poor HTML on mozilla... Henri Sivonen
- Re: Doctype-Sniffing and poor HTML on moz... Gervase Markham
- Re: Doctype-Sniffing and poor HTML on moz... Michael Nahrath
- Re: Doctype-Sniffing and poor HTML o... Henri Sivonen
- [OT] CVS for the mozilla.org web... Michael Nahrath
- Re: [OT] CVS for the mozilla.org... Henri Sivonen
- Re: Doctype-Sniffing and poor HTML on moz... Henri Sivonen
- Re: Doctype-Sniffing and poor HTML on mozilla.org... Ian Hickson
- Re: poor HTML on mozilla.org (was: wow) Henri Sivonen
