> Gerv, you suggested in this thread, that you have done very hard cross > browser testing to the site. > What was the reason to exclude the doctype declaration? If it was realy > to prevent the Mozilla Browser from staying in 'standards mode' it was a > shame! Henri Sivonen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote the latest version of the mozilla.org page wrapper and did some of the cross-browser testing. Ask him. Gerv
- Re: poor HTML on mozilla.org RV
- Re: poor HTML on mozilla.org Gord McFee
- Re: poor HTML on mozilla.org Steve Bowen
- Re: poor HTML on mozilla.org Chris Hoess
- Re: poor HTML on mozilla.org Michael Nahrath
- Re: poor HTML on mozilla.org (was: wow) Jon Hall
- Re: poor HTML on mozilla.org (was: wow) Gervase Markham
- Re: poor HTML on mozilla.org (was: wow) Henri Sivonen
- Re: poor HTML on mozilla.org (was: wow) Gervase Markham
- Doctype-Sniffing and poor HTML on mozilla.org (was: poor H... Michael Nahrath
- Re: Doctype-Sniffing and poor HTML on mozilla.org (wa... Gervase Markham
- Re: Doctype-Sniffing and poor HTML on mozilla.org... Peter Lairo
- Re: Doctype-Sniffing and poor HTML on mozilla... Michael Nahrath
- Re: Doctype-Sniffing and poor HTML on moz... Henri Sivonen
- Re: Doctype-Sniffing and poor HTML o... Michael Nahrath
- Re: Doctype-Sniffing and poor HTML o... Henri Sivonen
- Re: Doctype-Sniffing and poor HTML on mozilla.org Henri Sivonen
- Re: Doctype-Sniffing and poor HTML on mozilla... Gervase Markham
- Re: Doctype-Sniffing and poor HTML on mozilla... Michael Nahrath
- Re: Doctype-Sniffing and poor HTML on moz... Henri Sivonen
- [OT] CVS for the mozilla.org website... Michael Nahrath
