well well.. What you said is void and useless anyway. the thing The
problem is directly about Mozilla and Mozilla ID seems like NS 6 exactly
in this issue if i am not mistaken. if ID would be Mozilla after all, i
would not bother mentioning NS 6x. And still playing with words?.
Believe me if you say anything really matters about Mozilla and NS 6.x
stuff i will apologize to you.
but before this i will ask you some simple questions. if you give simple
answers i will be glad, Seriously. i respect if you dont give any
answer, or send it to my e-mail.
- What is your main operating system?
- Are you using Mozilla as your main browser?
- Would you use Mozilla if they launch the 1.0 Version 3-4 months later,
thinking of this development speed?
- Do you think Mozilla is getting any better between releases? What is
the grade for it?
- Do you think Mozilla team is listening user comments and caring what
they think comparing with other major browser companies?
- What would be your reason of using Mozilla if it would do everything
in your (JTK's) 1.0 proposal list?
(Security, Open Source, Fast Update, Fancy interface or any other?)
- Do you think if world needs an open source, standart compliant multi
OS browser, no matter what is the market share?
- What do you think is the best way of helping to a open source software
project as we mere users or alone programmers?
Above are also general Questions for anybody. i will give answers if you
interested it anwyay, here is your special question
- if your purpose is to help , do you believe you are doing your best
for it? (using reverse physcology or stg?). if not why are you posting
messages here?
Thanks,
Ahmet
JTK wrote:
> ahmetaa wrote:
>
>>i think this is a big problem of Mozilla and NS6.x products.
>>
>
> If you have a comment about NS 6 / 6.1 here is not the place for it.
> What you think is void and useless.
>
> Oh wait, that's your line....
>
> [snip]
>
