Garth Wallace wrote:
>
> "WDA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > First of all, let me say that I am adament about my devotion to the
> > Mozilla browser & email/client project; it is my browser of choice. I
> > do have a few concerns however.
> >
> > I use my computer extensively for meteorological purposes. What that
> > means is that I log on often to sites that use heavy mapping and
> > overlays. I find myself frustrated when in Mozilla, I can not overlay
> > cities, roads, rivers and etc. either on regional or metro radars for
> > that matter. Great weather sites such as www.accuweather.com,
> > www.intellicast.com or www.weathertap.com have these features that will
> > not work in Mozilla. I know that it is because they probably aren't
> > 100% web compliant but that doesn't mean I have to like it. It still
> > frustrates me very much. I want the browser of choice (Mozilla) to work
> > with all those pages.
>
> File Evangelism bugs against those sites and they'll be
> sent emails requesting that they make their pages
> standards-compliant.
Glad you think so. I don't forsee anyone doing it any time soon. Even if
they receive the emails. Until the day that Communicator 4.X or IE is
pulled off the amrket over night. it won't happen. JMHO.
(last word I will have in this thread.)
--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Phillip M. Jones, CET |MEMBER:VPEA (LIFE) ETA-I, NESDA,ISCET, Sterling
616 Liberty Street |Who's Who. PHONE:540-632-5045, FAX:540-632-0868
Martinsville Va 24112-1809|[EMAIL PROTECTED], ICQ11269732, AIM pjonescet
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
If it's "fixed", don't "break it"!
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
