Shaq Kondo wrote:
> When an evangelism bug is submitted does the webmaster simply get a
> generic form letter, or are they told exactly what standards they need
> to conform to? If so, are they then also pointed to some good websites
> that cover the standards in question?
Might depend on a case, but at least in some cases the evangelists
describe exactly what is wrong with their site and how to fix it.
> It could be interesting if a site would allow users to file web
> standards bugs, have these bugs verified with a standard compliant
> browser, and then added to a list of offending websites. Users could
> then have the necessary info to send further complaints to webmasters.
> Wouldn't a few thousand emails from seperate users about web standards
> be more effective than a single email from mozilla.org?
I doubt volume would help. Most likely the webmaster would then direct
all the thousands of emails to /dev/null automatically without ever
reading them, and possibly banning the quilty browser from the site.
--
Heikki Toivonen
