Jay Garcia wrote:
>
>Ok, I'll affirm that what you correctly stated is correct and what wasn'
>t isn't .. ;-)
>
>I respect the NDA that I signed many years ago and is till very much in
>effect. That which is posted in our 'private' group is considered under
>NDA unless it is specifically allowed to be made public. Some of the
>issues that both you and David mention were specifically addressed
>recently in our private group and therefore are considered to be under
>our NDA.
>
I respect your position about NDA since I have been involved in similar
agreements testing Lotus SmartSuite, Lotus Notes/Domino. But why stating
that netscape 6.1 is more than just Moz 0.92 is erroneous or a
violation of NDA? It is public notice (moz newsgroups, bug fix reports
from bugzilla) that they have taken bug fixes that went into the trunk
towards 0.93 and that they also made additional bug fixes into the
branch not scheduled for 0.93. That is all public knowledge and that is
what i said. ;-)
