Hi,
Er, a neat little thing happened a few years ago, it was called
releasing the source, and it was done by Netscape. The branch that
Netscape 6.1 rtm is based off of is hardly a secret. In fact,
everything RV stated was correct. Netscape 6.1 is based off the 0.9.2
branch, but many fixes that went onto the trunk (and thus 0.9.3) were
put on the branch as well. Don't bother responding to people if you're
just going to drop hints about being under NDA. This isn't a popularity
contest.
Thanks,
- Blake Ross
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jay Garcia wrote:
> RV wrote:
>
>
>>That is a misconception too. Netscape is not based strictly on Moz 0.92.
>>As work progressed on Moz 0.93 many fixes that went to 0.93 were also
>>incorporated into the 0.92 branch that became Netscape 6.1. The code for
>>Netscape6.1 is going to be released soon as Moz 0.92.1 but they could
>>easily name it 0.92.6 or so.
>>
>>Mark wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>Jay Garcia wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>What you probably confused was the statement at the bottom that
>>>>essentially states that themes designed for 6.0/6.01 are NOT compatible
>>>>with 6.1 which can lead one to believe that Toy Factory was designed for
>>>>6.0/6.01 which it was NOT ...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>Gotcha. Thanks. It's really too bad that they (Netscape) didn't hold
>>>off just a *bit* longer, so that Moz .93 could've been it's base. The
>>>browser's most excellent, but the mail/news improvements in Mozilla
>>>.93 aren't worth losing. Still, it's come a long way, and my hat's off
>>>to the Mozilla team. Great work!
>>>
>>>Mark
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> Some of what you say is somewhat correct and some is totally incorrect.
> Same for the statement by David Gerard in a previous thread on the
> subject. Just what IS correct and NOT correct I can't say because of
> being under Netscape NDA ... <sigh>
>
