Frank Hecker wrote: > True, Stallman and the FSF don't like certain aspects of the NPL (or the > MPL) and prefer that people use the GPL instead, but they clearly > believe that the NPL and MPL meet their criteria for "free software". Stallman doesn't like ANYTHING that doesn't have his stamp on it. Hell, he's the one who started pushing calling Linux "GNU/Linux" just so he'd get his ego stroked. He could have at least used "Linux/GNU" since he had ZIP to do with the Linux kernel... -- jesus X [ Booze-fueled paragon of pointless cruelty and wanton sadism. ] email [ jesusx @ who.net ] web [ http://burntelectrons.com ] [ Updated April 29, 2001 ] tag [ The Universe: It's everywhere you want to be. ] warning [ War doesn't determine who is right, war determines who is left. ]
- Legal status of the Mozilla organisation Dan Boresjo
- Re: Legal status of the Mozilla organisation Peter Lairo
- Re: Legal status of the Mozilla organisation Dan Boresjo
- Re: Legal status of the Mozilla organisation Frank Hecker
- Re: Legal status of the Mozilla organisation H�kan Waara
- Re: Legal status of the Mozilla organisation Frank Hecker
- Re: Legal status of the Mozilla organisation H�kan Waara
- Re: Legal status of the Mozilla organisation Frank Hecker
- Re: Legal status of the Mozilla organisation JTK
- Re: Legal status of the Mozilla organisation JTK
- Re: Legal status of the Mozilla organisation Frank Hecker
- Re: Legal status of the Mozilla organisation Ian Hickson
- Re: Legal status of the Mozilla organisation Ian Hickson
- Re: Legal status of the Mozilla organisation Ian Hickson
- Re: Legal status of the Mozilla organisation JTK
- Re: Legal status of the Mozilla organisation Ian Hickson
- Re: Legal status of the Mozilla organisation Chuck Simmons
- Re: Legal status of the Mozilla organisation JTK
- Re: Legal status of the Mozilla organisation Ian Hickson
