Peter Lairo wrote: > If AOL is the biggest contributer on a project that is beneficial to the > whole world (MPL & standards conform), then something is wrong. Why > isn't there a higher proportion of "idealist" programmers and other > companies contributing? Either, there is something fishy about the legal > structure of this project, or mozilla.org doesn't do enough to attract > new contributers. Maybe you should read: http://www.jwz.org/gruntle/nomo.html and http://www.jwz.org/gruntle/aol.html Holger -- Leela: "Just relax, Bender. Tomorrow we'll pry you down, have a nice breakfast, and then go hunt down and slaughter that ancient evil." Fry: "It'll be a rich full day." Netscape 6 FAQ deutsch: http://www.hmetzger.de
- Re: Legal status of the Mozilla organisation JTK
- Re: Legal status of the Mozilla organisation Chuck Simmons
- Re: Legal status of the Mozilla organisation Frank Hecker
- Re: Legal status of the Mozilla organisation Ian Hickson
- Re: Legal status of the Mozilla organisation Frank Hecker
- Re: Legal status of the Mozilla organisation JTK
- Re: Legal status of the Mozilla organisation Ian Hickson
- Re: Legal status of the Mozilla organisation Peter Lairo
- Re: Legal status of the Mozilla organisation Ian Hickson
- Re: Legal status of the Mozilla organisation Holger Metzger
- Re: Legal status of the Mozilla organisation Frank Hecker
- Re: Legal status of the Mozilla organisation Frank Hecker
- Re: Legal status of the Mozilla organisation Blake Ross
- Re: Legal status of the Mozilla organisation John Vandenberg
- Re: Legal status of the Mozilla organisation Frank Hecker
