> If AOL is the biggest contributer on a project that is beneficial to the
> whole world (MPL & standards conform), then something is wrong. Why
> isn't there a higher proportion of "idealist" programmers and other
> companies contributing? Either, there is something fishy about the legal
> structure of this project, or mozilla.org doesn't do enough to attract
> new contributers.
Umm....yes...the amount of sense you make is absolutely astounding. There are
other companies contributing. "IBM", "Sun", "OEone", "Activestate", and a
couple others that can't yet be revealed come to mind. Or is the problem
simply that one contributor is currently bigger than the others? I don't see
your point.
--Blake
