>> Anyone serving up XHTML as text/XML is a joke in my book anyway. >> > > Um... why? XHTML *is* an application of XML, so text/xml seems to me to > be absolutely correct. Apart from the fact that, given that it's not really meant for humans to read raw, application/xml would be more appropriate. Also, XHTML has its own mime type - application/xhtml+xml. Gerv
- What's the deal with Mike Angelo Paul Bergsagel
- Re: What's the deal with Mike Angelo Asa Dotzler
- Re: What's the deal with Mike Angelo David Gerard
- Re: What's the deal with Mike Angelo Jerry Baker
- Re: What's the deal with Mike Angelo Jason Johnston
- Re: What's the deal with Mike Angelo Gervase Markham
- Re: What's the deal with Mike Angelo Henri Sivonen
- Re: What's the deal with Mike Angelo nospam
- Re: What's the deal with Mike Angelo Henri Sivonen
- Re: What's the deal with Mike Angelo nospam
- Re: What's the deal with Mike Angelo Henri Sivonen
