>> Anyone serving up XHTML as text/XML is a joke in my book anyway.
>>
> 
> Um... why?  XHTML *is* an application of XML, so text/xml seems to me to 
> be absolutely correct.


Apart from the fact that, given that it's not really meant for humans to 
read raw, application/xml would be more appropriate.

 

Also, XHTML has its own mime type - application/xhtml+xml.


Gerv



Reply via email to