> All this just prooves how religeous nuts pervert the meaning of
> neutrality and humanitarianism. A cross is a basic (geometric?) shape.
> There is no reason for one group to claim sole rights to it (and every
> variation thereof). That's just silly (actually, it's calculated
> demonstration of power through symbology - THAT symbol is MINE)).
You have this the wrong way round. Christianity is not claiming
exclusive use of the cross symbol. The problem arises because
non-Christians see a cross symbol and assume Christianity. The problem
is in their minds, not the Christians. If they have a hateful reaction
to that symbol, that is a further problem that they have.
Gerv
