> > All this just prooves how religeous nuts pervert the meaning of
> > neutrality and humanitarianism. A cross is a basic (geometric?) shape.
> > There is no reason for one group to claim sole rights to it (and every
> > variation thereof). That's just silly (actually, it's calculated
> > demonstration of power through symbology - THAT symbol is MINE)).
>
>
> You have this the wrong way round. Christianity is not claiming
> exclusive use of the cross symbol. The problem arises because
> non-Christians see a cross symbol and assume Christianity. The problem
> is in their minds, not the Christians. If they have a hateful reaction
> to that symbol, that is a further problem that they have.
>
Stopstopstopstopstop. No more. Focus on Mozilla. I've seen threads
like this get out of control.
