Gervase Markham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > Well, from the large amount of heat and tiny amount of light on the > issue [spell checker], I'd say it's not on the radar. IMHO, the reason there isn't a spell checker in Mozilla is that Netscape already has a license for one for their product, and they haven't funded development for the Mozilla organization to develop one because they don't need it. As most people know, a majority of the Mozilla Engineering work gets done with Netscape dollars (not that there's anything wrong with that). Again, IMHO, we won't see a spell checker in Mozilla until A) Somebody outside of Netscape funds development for it or B) Some other non-Netscape group decides to take this on. Brian!
- Re: Mozilla is not an end user application--... Warren Bell
- Re: Mozilla is not an end user application--... David Coppit
- Re: Mozilla is not an end user application--huh? Warren Bell
- Re: Mozilla is not an end user application--huh? Justin H.
- Re: Mozilla is not an end user application--huh? Justin H.
- Re: Mozilla is not an end user application--huh? Ian Hickson
- Re: Mozilla is not an end user application--huh? Warren Bell
- Re: Mozilla is not an end user application--huh? David Coppit
- Re: Mozilla is not an end user application--huh? Aaron Andersen
- Re: Mozilla is not an end user application--huh? Brian Clark
- Re: Mozilla is not an end user application--huh? Emlyn
- Re: Mozilla is not an end user application--huh? jesus X
- Re: Mozilla is not an end user application--huh? Asa Dotzler
- Re: Mozilla is not an end user application--huh? Simon Montagu
- Re: Mozilla is not an end user application--huh? Justin H.
- Re: Mozilla is not an end user application--huh? Gervase Markham
- Re: Mozilla is not an end user application--huh? Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.
- Re: Mozilla is not an end user application--huh? Daniel Veditz
- Re: Mozilla is not an end user application--huh? Matthew Thomas
