Mama Cass wrote:
> In netscape.public.mozilla.general the people heard RV say these wise
> words:
>
>
>>Do you expect a beta or pre-release
>>version to be fully operational without bugs or inconsistensies?
>>
>
> No.
>
> But I expect "fixes" to be exactly that, and not be a cause of some other
> breakage.
So if from one milestone to the other 1000 bugs get fixed and 200
additional bugs are added (regressions and new ones), you don't consider
that as progress? What about when fixing one bug exposes and underlying
bug or bugs that no one noticed before? Is that progress? I think it is.
Mozillaquest comes to mind. According to the Mr. Angelo Mozilla is
buggier and worse now because it has more bugs (listed in bugzilla) now
than before. Wonderful logic. If you follow that logic Milestone 3 was
more stable and feature rich than M.94, or better yet an unexisting
product is better because it has no bugs reported yet. hehehe!
Can you define what beta software or pre-release software is? I think
you should stay away from beta or pre-release software if you don't have
the patience to deal with the ups and down.
