Jerry Park wrote: > > Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote: > > > I know little more about the subject since I raised the Active-X > > question a few months ago. I was politely (and not so <grin>) told the > > above info though I don't remember for sure whether it was xpcom or xul > > (believe it was xpcom). > > > > > Yes, I know. Not wild about any ActiveX in anything I browse with, but so > > far mozilla seems secure. Guess that does mean that ActiveX is, to that > extent, available on other operating systems. I stand corrected.
Mozilla does not use ActiveX. Philip is confused.
