"Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T." wrote: > Garth Wallace wrote: > ----snip---- > > > Don't be an ass. > > Not trying to be. > > Just admitting that there is no way I can post anything correct in your eyes. > > Still if both MSCOM and XPCOM are viariants of COM. And Active-X is part > of MSCOM .... > > Anyway if the subject should come up again in the future; I'll post to > "wait for a reply by Garth Wallace since he seems to know the most about > the subject. >
you still have it backwards - MSCOM is the object model _beneath_ ActivX and ActiveX is nothing more that a renamed OLE dave
