David Hyatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 16 Nov 2001: > > > I'm seeing a lot of ridiculous assumptions and accusations being > made about the general architecture of the feature itself. If > you're going to hurl inflammatory remarks in this newsgroup and/or > make grossly inaccurate judgments based on incorrect assumptions > about the architecture of the favicon feature, at least get your > facts straight.
Is it possible to "make grossly inaccurate judgements based on incorrect assumptions" when you "get the facts straight"? If you had the facts, you wouldn't be making inaccurate judgements based on incorrect assumptions anymore, now would you? ;) -- ICQ: N/A (temporarily) AIM: FlyersR1 9 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ = m
