I'll never get tired of referencing

http://www.e.kth.se/~e97_jsi/rfe.mp3

:-)

/ Jonas Sicking

"Robert Zaichkowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Good evening!
>
> For Netscape 6.x and Mozilla 0.9.x, I have come up with the demand for
> the following features :
>
> 1. ActiveX support
>
> Why?  There are certain web sites that can only be viewed by Internet
> Explorer 4.0 and higher.  And this can be a real big inconvenience for
> those who really loathe IE such as myself and over 40 million others!
> That way, we can tear down some of Microsoft's major blockades!
>
> 2. HTTP Mail Server Support
>
> Why?  Outlook Express is the only e-mail client to support this feature!
>    And this is integral if one were to view his/her Hotmail account
offline.
>
> 3. Improve File Manager Capabilities
>
> How?  By allowing users to view information on hard drives.  By adding a
> tab that will allow users to view all the folders in the hard drive.  By
> allowing users to move, copy, and delete some of the files.
>
> 4. Better Font Support for Mail&News and Composer
>
> Why?  One can pick from only five different fonts in Netscape 6.1 and
> Mozilla 0.9.6.  Netscape 4.78 allows you to choose any of the fonts that
> are installed on your computer!  It sure does elp make the text more
> appealing, for sure!
>
> There's also one thing which I think should be removed (From Netscape
> 6.x, that is) :
>
> Remove that friggin' AOL on Desktop!  It's the biggest F***ing nusaince
> to have on a computer and over 90 percent of the Internet world doesn't
> give a crap about this!  I have personally tested AOL and it messed up
> my PC big time!  Even though Netscape was bought by AOL doesn't mean
> that AOL can force them to put on unwanted stuff by default such as this!
>
> If Netscape and Mozilla could inplement some of these features in their
> upcoming browsers, then that would really help bring back some more of
> the former Netscape users who went for the damned Internet Explorer.
>



Reply via email to