IE6 sucks grabbing webcontent before loading on my USR 56K here even at 
52.0K connect.. Mozilla can grab and display faster (by how much faster, 
dunno, but I use a 8192 mem-cache) way before IE6 can display on many 
pages.. that is on P3-733, 512Meg Ram.

-IE is not faster on every system.


JTK wrote:

> Subject:
> 
> Re: Mozilla 1.0: JTK/Hixie performance criteria suggestions?
> From:
> 
> JTK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date:
> 
> Mon, 26 Nov 2001 17:33:04 -0600
> 
> Newsgroups:
> 
> netscape.public.mozilla.general
> 
> 
> Gervase Markham wrote:
> 
> [snip]
> 
> 
>>>> > The goals of our performance criteria are for a user who switches from
>>>> > the at-that-point current version of IE to the Mozilla 1.0 build to
>>>> > not experience a regression in performance that is greater than a
>>>> > factor of two. (Ideally, of course, there would be no regression at
>>>> > all. This is simply a goal for a 1.0 release.)
>>>
>>> 
>>> Because we have decided to have a stable branch in Q1 next year, and
>>> call it Mozilla 1.0, things have become unavoidably more date-driven
>>> than they used to be (that's not to say we won't slip if we're not
>>> happy.) The Performance team, and anyone who wants to help them, will be
>>> fixing dependencies of the performance tracking 1.0 metabug as fast as
>>> they can up to the wire. That's all we can ask.
>>>
>>
> 
> In other words, performance of half-as-good as min(IE,NS4.x) is not
> achievable, and will not be part of the release criteria for Mozilla
> 1.0.  All that matters is a circled box on a calendar... strangely
> similar to the Fiascape 6.0 release criteria, no?
> 
> My, you could knock me over with a feather.
> 
> Guys, just do me one favor: don't be surprised in the least when Mozilla
> 1.0 is released and it's ignored as much as Netscape 6.0 was reviled. 
> IE is getting so hella-fast I can't hardly believe it.  Have any of you
> tried IE6 on XP?  Honestly, it screams through a lousy 56K *modem* - I'm
> afraid to find out what it will do through a DSL or cable setup!
> 
> BTW: What in God's name is with all the fricken spam in this newsgroup
> (which oddly enough still has that "netscape." on it even though we were
> told there were plans in place to change that months ago)?  Sheesh, I
> leave for a few days and the whole place goes to hell.
> 
> -- Gary "JTK" Van Sickle (Yep, I'm still standin' ;-))
> 



Reply via email to