Demon, I think you are resulting to splitting hairs for the sole purpose of degrading and insulting Phillip. Your arguments are often petty and seem to deliberately avoid what Phillip is saying. This is a common and primitive/unproductive rhetorical trick.
Phillip may not be contributing at a level or in the way you want, but it is clear (to me, at least) that he is well intentioned and he is contributing relevant info (obviously, not 100% of the time - but who is?). Although Phillip may be the less knowledgeable, I would argue that you are definetely the "mean" and "angry" one. -- Regards, Peter Lairo
