DeMoN LaG wrote:
> JTK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 17 Dec 2001:
>
>>No, both you guys are "WackedV". You're going to make fun of IE6
>>in the areas of speed and stability, two metrics by which IE6
>>inarguably beats the living crappola out of Mozilla? CUC-KOO!
>>CUC-KOO!
>>
>
> Actually, I use a Win NT based operating system, where independant tests
> show Mozilla is faster than IE6. As for stability... Haven't had a
> crash in a while on Win 2k.
Same here. I use Mozilla (almost) exclusively, on Win2k, and it's quite
rare for it to crash. Speed-wise, it is the equal of IE, for browsing.
Where Mozilla is slow is with all the dialogs (the XUL stuff).
But don't get me wrong, because I absolutely _love_ XUL! Once it is as
fast as "native" (I don't see why it shouldn't be, in principle), then
XUL will rule.
- Chuck
