Ben Goodger wrote: > I find it amusing that you say this, given IE's abundant use of > non-native widgets. > > A Martinez wrote: > >> If this shortcut is mean to please IE users, then the first step is to >> remove the XUL and put back an UI with native widgets so they really >> find everything where they expect to be. >
They integrate those widgets in the OS, so they become native. Didn't you heard something about DoJ vs MS? If a user finds the same widget across various MS products and even some other applications, then we can say surely that this is a native widget, no matter if it was originally developed for IE or for any generic app. The point is that nobody should argue that something is done in Mozilla just to please IE users. They will find too many differences just to care about a simple shortcut when there are a lot of other shortcuts that haven't been copied.
