Not snipping headers to illustrate yet another major defect in Mozilla (just so nobody thinks I'm "lying" (or did I quadruple-space these myself?)). Conditions to recreate: hit the reply button.
Pratik wrote: > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Subject: > > Re: It's December 14th again! > From: > > Pratik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: > > Fri, 21 Dec 2001 11:21:58 -0500 > > Newsgroups: > > netscape.public.mozilla.general > > Path: > > secnews.netscape.com!not-for-mail > Newsgroups: > > netscape.public.mozilla.general > Organization: > > Another Netscape Collabra Server User > Lines: > > 65 > Message-ID: > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > References: > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > NNTP-Posting-Host: > > 65.117.135.98 > Mime-Version: > > 1.0 > Content-Type: > > text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed > Content-Transfer-Encoding: > > 7bit > User-Agent: > > Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.7+) Gecko/20011220 > X-Accept-Language: > > en-us > Xref: > > secnews.netscape.com netscape.public.mozilla.general:37516 > > > On 12/21/01 08:08 AM, JTK wrote: > >>> <snipping all the crap> >>> >> >> >> Crap huh? We back to "it's all a dream" now? > > > > Crap because I was more interested in the interaction than stuff about > CRLF. No, then it would be [snip]. > If what I suggested didn't work, then I would have gone back and > paid more attention to what you said. > Well now that sombody else has entered a bug on this, feel free to do so. Hell, feel free to add it to the bug if that's possible. > >>> The question still stands. Did you try out what the bug suggests? Yes or >>> No? >>> >> >> No. > > > > Why won't you even confirm that its the interaction thats causing the > problem and not Mozilla by itself? > Isn't that AOL's job? I don't work for AOL. >> >>> And did that solve your problem? Yes or No? >>> >>> >> >> N/A. >> >> Are you telling me that AOL doesn't have the paid resources to install >> Proxomitron, pull up CNN, wait a few days, then pull it up again? > > > > No I'm saying that if you have a problem and people ask you to try > something to see if it helps, you should try and let them know the > result. *I* don't have the problem sir, AOL does. I've brought it to your attention in the vain hope that it might actually get fixed someday. > I tried helping you in tracking this down. The least you could > do is confirm what people are suspecting. Actually people (I hope not you) are suspecting that I'm lying. > That its the > Mozilla/Proxomitron interaction thats the problem. Can't you confirm > that? If you can confirm it, people can investigate. > Like I said, AOL can certainly investigate this themselves if they want to. If they don't want to, I certainly can't force them to. > More things you could try. With Proxomitron on in all its glory, go to > http://webtools.mozilla.org/web-sniffer/ Type in www.cnn.com, click on > verbose mode, hit the submit button and post the HTTP header that you see. > Alright, tell you what. You stop calling *my* suspicions "crap" and I'll do this for you and AOL. Gratis. > >> >> My statement still stands: IE works fine, Mozilla shows me old CNN. >> That's a freebie. You're welcome. > > > > Agreed. Agreed what? You agree that there's a problem? What do you need me and my "crap" for then? > But would you please help us figure out who is the culprit? Just > saying Mozilla is doesn't help. You ostensibly didn't know about it before. Now you do. It's therefore helped. > If you can answer my questions, then > maybe we can decide its Mozilla but if you don't we don't have proof > that its Mozilla. Its like saying "But this web page displays fine in > IE". Thats no reason to conclude that the web page is fully standards > compliant. > You saw the headers that somebody posted, right? (Or was that you yourself that posted them?) Are they OK or not? > Did you try Opera to see if that works well? > No. But here, I'll try NC4.78... ...it's fine, through Proxomitron. But guess what - Mozilla again shows yesterday's CNN. I'll even post a screenshot for you. Gratis. > Pratik. > >
