And it came to pass that JTK wrote: > Christopher Jahn wrote: >> >> And it came to pass that JTK wrote: >> > > [snip] > >> > Two things: >> > >> > 1. Regardless of what people are telling you, it's not a >> > "standards battle". Mozilla is so poorly written that it >> > simply dies on most pages regardless of their >> > "standardness", and the further outside the lines the >> > page is, the wackier Mozilla gets. >> >> Put up or shut up: list a validated page that fails to >> display in Mozilla. >> > > http://www.cnn.com/. Well, unless you need to do research > on week-old news for some reason, perhaps if you were a time > traveller or something. For us more mundane types, we call > it "failing to display properly".
No, it's better described as "non-compliant to HTML standards": http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cnn.com%2F&charset=%28detect+automatically%29&doctype=Inline > >> 2. I want all nations of the >> > world to speak English. But not just English, the >> > specific dialect of English that I do. That way I don't >> > have to go to the trouble of learning all those other >> > languages, nor the idioms of all the different English >> > dialects. How much chance do you think I have of getting >> > that to happen? >> >> Called overseas recently? Ever? > > Apparently you can't read my dialect of English blablabla. More irelevant whining by idiot-boy. > >> Know why you can? Standards. > > Plural. > >> Also, your metaphor isn't accurate; > > It's 100% on the mark. You see that "tantrum" paragraph > above? That's *gold* baby! golden turds, maybe. But it doesn't correlate to your claims at all. > >> it's MicroSoft > > Wait, shouldn't that be "Micro$oft"? Isn't that the "1337" > way to type it, "d00d"? > >> that wants >> everyone to speak its native dialrct, not the standards >> compliant browsers like Mozilla. >> > > Microsoft has 95%+ of the market. They can display every > site Mozilla can and plenty it can't > > Mozilla has 0.75% of the market. Why is that? Why Chris? > Because MS illegally used its monopoly to make sure that it worked out that way. It sure wasn't the qulaity of the product that did it. >> The best part of JTK ran down his mama's thing. I don't >> know why he's allowed to post here - all he does is >> denigrate the product and the Organizations goals. >> > > Unlike sentences such as "The best part of JTK ran down his > mama's thing"? What's that even supposed to mean, "d00d", > and why should you be allowed to post it here? > -- }:-) Christopher Jahn {:-( Dionysian Reveler How horrible and true and strange, and there is no possible change. To reply: xjahnATyahooDOTcom
