I see a number of people that want mozilla to use new artwork because its communist/ugly/whatever... Whats the problem with including new artwork into the tree (I have seen a few good examples around on these boards)? One recurring suggestion is to use the red dinosaur head like in the mozilla.org favicon, whats the problem with that? Given that its in the favicon and in other places on mozilla.org and stuff, one can assume that mozilla.org "owns" the red dino head from a copyright point of view so there shouldnt be any problems, right?
