Christopher Jahn wrote: > [snip]
> > > > In my opinion, given a straight fight (which manifestly did > > NOT happen, see the US Supreme Court's "Findings of Fact" > > for details) IE4/5 would have won significant market share > > from Netscape. They would not have achieved total market > > dominance, nor risen to market leader, as quickly as > > actually happened, but with IE4 out there, Netscape would > > not have held on to the 85% (or whatever) market share they > > had. > > Like the actual results of the last presidential election, we'll > never know now. > Water under the proverbial bridge. What's AOL I mean the Mozilla community doing *now* to get Mozilla more than 0.75% market share? And don't say "making up an endless barrage of excuses", that and a buck will get you a glass of water at Starbucks.
