Christian Biesinger wrote: > If you think so... In the next sentence, I said that I meant that > anybody can still read the profile files, even though the user might > think they are now very well protected.
That's what the warning statement is for. >> You are aware that *0 < profile passwords < 128bit protection* is at >> least some protection? > The password only prevents a user from choosing the profile in Mozilla's > profile list, afaik. Correct. *That* is the "protection" most of us are asking for. >> - and YES, we *fully* understand the limitations! > Well, you understand it. Will users also understand it? *I* am a user. And nearly everyone who has been requesting this is a user as well (as opposed to the Linux users & developers who have been opposing it). >> It seems people like you who are unable to see beyond black and white, >> or are incapable of comprehending subtle nuances. > I'm not sure if I understand this sentence, it seems like parts of it > are missing. Not really, but it wasn't an important sentence anyhow - sorry. ;) -- Regards, Peter Lairo
