In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, S�ren Kuklau wrote:

[ROT-13]

> 
> Erm... are you serious?! Kind of a funny secret language? Reminds me of 
> l33t...

Evidently you don't use Usenet much.  ROT-13 is quite common for spoilers 
and other "hidden" text that people want to communicate, but not be parsed 
in a casual read.

> Well, I don't consider this urgent at all. 1.1 is fine.

I'd venture to disagree; I use ROT-13 about every other time I read news.

-- 
Chris Hoess

Reply via email to