In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Albert
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Don't "convictions" usually result in "sentencing"? There's been
>> nothing like that in this case, at least that I've noticed.
>
>Result of a wussy government. No, really, it is.
I dunno; I think it's the result of one federal judge who just couldn't keep
his trap shut. Jackson's comments were the basis of the appeals court's
overturning his ordered remedies.
--
Mike Koenecke
send responses to mkoenecke ("at" symbol) alum.haverford.edu
