On Mon, 28 Jan 2002 16:45:06 -0600, JTK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: :But man oh man, talk about Mozillapology! Holy God, :his "Lies, Damned Lies, and MozillaQuest" 'article' has me in stitches! : :"To get technical for just a moment, the total number of bugs [in :Bugzilla] at any given time is a function of the number of Bugzilla :reporters, not a function of the quality of Mozilla." :BAAAAAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAA!!!! So let's see now, "technically" then, if we :have Mozilla loaded with bugs vs. BizzaroMozilla which is 100% bug-free, :and both have the same number of people signed up in Bugzilla, the total :number of bugs reported WILL BE THE SAME IN BOTH?!?!?! EVEN THOUGH ONE :***HAS NO BUGS***?!?!??!!?
No, it's an O(n) thing, per project. Plot bugzilla numbers against testers at that time (nightly downloaders, active Bugzilla posters or whatever). I vaguely recall someone reporting the same about Debian - obscure packages with not many users may be bug farms but have very few reports, whereas dpkg, which is used by almost everyone, works almost perfectly for everyone but has a huge amount of bugs against it - most of which are valid. -- http://thingy.apana.org.au/~fun/ http://www.rocknerd.org/ "burger king apple fritters taste like cunt." (siani evans)
