James Clash wrote: > Good to hear - but what I still don't unterstand is the fact that > the regression has been reported on 2001-12-27 and although this > regression is having a great impact it hasn't been fixed for 0.9.8 ?!
Because it's not at all trivial to fix that.
--
Regards,
S�ren Kuklau ('Chucker')
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
