S�ren Kuklau wrote: > James Clash wrote: > >> Good to hear - but what I still don't unterstand is the fact that >> the regression has been reported on 2001-12-27 and although this >> regression is having a great impact it hasn't been fixed for 0.9.8 ?! > > > Because it's not at all trivial to fix that. >
I understand, but Jesup Randell has provided a patch on the day of reporting, so a month for investigation/coding should have been enough for thoroughly testing and adapting - especially for a new milestone release this shouldn't have happened. -- James
