Pratik wrote: > On 02/04/2002 03:34 PM, JTK wrote: > <snip> > >> Yeah, fine, whatever, the non-updated script worked fine with both >> NC4.7x and IE. Evangelism bug! (Man could THAT have been more aptly >> named): >> >> "Dear Sirs, >> Your web site does not render properly on my web browser, which has >> 0.75% market share. Please spend considerable effort and money >> redoing it so that my defective browser can render it properly." > > > Yes. A mail similar but written in a much better way would be sent to > such webmasters. In the long run, updating their code would be beneficial. >
Beneficial to whom? > Pratik. > >
