DeMoN LaG wrote: > JTK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], > on 04 Feb 2002: > > >>That was supposedly a DOM issue; Mozilla doesn't support the same >>DOMs that all other web browsers apparently do, and is therefore >>unable to render many of them properly. Oh well, I'm sure >>everybody will be willing to rewrite their HTML so that Mozilla's >>0.75% of the population can view their websites properly. >> > > "Same DOMs that all other web browser do"??? Um, dude, do you know what > a "DOM" is?
Document Object Model? > There are only 3 of them out there. Only three? And Mozilla can't handle a mere *three*? > A proprietary Netscape > 4.x DOM that includes Document.layers, a proprietary IE DOM that > includes document.all, and a W3C complient one that Mozilla implements. > The problem is NONE of the browser support all 3. All of them, however, > should work with the W3C complient one. No, Mozilla should render all existing web pages as well or better than all existing web browsers. If that means it has to know what a "document.all" is, tough noogs. > If people didn't do dumb things > like go "I'm lazy, I'll just use Frontpage and not bother learning how > to do my own code", God. I suppose you want me to code on punch cards too, huh? Mr. LaG: IT'S 2002. WEB PAGES ARE NOT "CODE". WRITING HTML BY HAND DOES NOT MAKE YOU A "PROGRAMMER". > you get crappy pages that don't work in some browers No Ace, just Mozilla.
