On Tue, 12 Feb 2002 22:34:12 -0600, JTK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >RV wrote: >> >> JTK wrote: >> > RV wrote: >> > >> >>JTK wrote: >> > >> > Yeah, I know IE and NC4.7x BOTH fly on semi-modern hardware. I was >> > referring to *Mozilla*. >> > >> >> Wordstar used to fly on old hardware too. Win 3.11 ran very well in a >> 486 environment with 4megs yet Win 95 replaced it despite the fact it >> required a Pentium class CPU and at least 16 megs of RAM. > >Win95 was a hell of a lot better than Win3.11. Mozilla is a hell of a >lot *worse* than NC4.7x and IE.
Win95 better than Win3.11. You'd have to be joking. The second release did a few things better but it still crashed far more often than Win3.0 ever did. You are obviously having some sort of love affair with M$ so why don't you take your negative attitude and put it where your mother never kissed you. (Of course with your attitude she might just have been kinky enough to like kissing you there.)
