> 2. "Standards-compliant", which translates, "Standards-compliant web > browser, when it's convenient for AOL, and at the expense of > 'defacto-standards compliant'". > > I completely support 100%, 1000% standards compliance, but not when it > means that I can't view web pages that already exist and can be viewed > on IE and NC4.7x browsers. Now you and I know that standards-compliance > doesn't in any way make that impossible, but AOL doesn't seem to > understand that. Or rather, they use that as an excuse to not do things > right. >
That's a very funny joke. Gave me a good laugh, thanks. Oh, wait, how's it go? BWWAAAAHAHAAAHHHAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAA!!!!!!
