I have the same problem today, using NS 6.2.1 -- site comes in OK with 
IE6, but just spins its wheels on a blank page with NS, eventually 
coming back with "connection refused". I ran the page through the W3C 
HTML validation service (using IE), and after an inordinately long time, 
it responded with this:

"Fatal Error: no document type declaration; will parse without validation

I could not parse this document, because it uses a public identifier 
that is not in my catalog.

You should make the first line of your HTML document a DOCTYPE 
declaration, for example, for a typical HTML 4.01 document..."

I tried again, selecting HTML 4.01 Transitional (as likely to be the 
most forgiving). Again, it took a long, long time, then responded with a 
huge list of code errors, from improper nesting to missing tags. The 
page is basically a horrible mess. No wonder NS is choking on it -- so 
should any decent browser.

Cheers,
Martin

Christopher Jahn wrote:

> On 03 Mar 2002, you wrote in netscape.public.mozilla.general:
> 
> 
>>I can't seem to access www.cox.com in Mozilla 0.97.  It
>>works fine in Netscape (4.78), but I've tried multiple times
>>to access it in Moz, and I get "The connection was refused
>>when attempting to contact www.cox.com" 
>>
>>I know this has happened in the past when a site was too
>>busy or something, but it consistently works with Netscape,
>>and consistently doesn't work with Moz, at least for the
>>last 10 minutes. 
>>
>>
> 
> Works fine in 0.9.8.
> 
> Rotten bastards don't offer a Flash-free page.  Must be hell on 
> dial-up surfers looking in.
> 
> Speaking of poor netiquette, your sig dash is missing - you 
> should have a "-- " above your sig.  I had to manually trim your 
> sig in the reply.  Time consuming.  
> 
> 
> 


Reply via email to