Arg. OK. Let's continue flaming.

Netscape Basher wrote:
> Christian Biesinger typed:
>> Netscape Basher wrote:
>>> Abandonment of theme development on 6.2.1? Shitting on users
>> Pardon?? You call it "shitting on users" providing five themes for a 
>> browser?
> 
> Considering Netscape hasn't made single one available for months. Opera 
> gives dozens of themes.

I didn't know that Opera supports themes...
And, by the way, I just went to the Opera Home Page and was unable to 
find a single theme there.

>>> Giving you a worthless version of Real Player? That is a big issue
>>
>> Which version does Netscape come with?
>>
>> But anyway, if you want a newer one, don't install the one distributed 
>> with Netscape, but get it from real.com.  This is not at all a big issue.
> 
> End users shouldn't have to do this and it is a big deal with modem 
> users, which are the majority of users.

Personally, I find that RealPlayer 8 works with everything that I've tried.

>>> Having to register it? That is a big issue
>> You don't have to register it.
> 
> Oh, and that lovely pop-up box is just there to please us?

Click the "X" Button in the upper right corner.
Or follow my suggestion from another posting.

>>> And the fact it's been four years and STILL no 1.0 Mozilla version, 
>>> and the roadmap continues to be moved back.
>> My personal guess is that 1.0 will be released in April, as the 
>> roadmap states.
> 
> Go back and read the road map from two years ago. One year ago.
> 0.9.9 is behind schedule.

0.9.9 is not behind schedule. The Roadmap only talks about an "ideal 
release". We will release it later. So what? Better release a better 
product later than a bad product now.
And in any case it needs not affect the 1.0 release.

>>> And the fact more bugs are being found than fixed.
>> Most "new found bugs" are really either already known or requests for 
>> enhancements.
> Not according to their own statistics. More bugs are being assigned than 
> fixed.

I don't see a contradiction here.

> Mozilla is not an end-product, it is a beta product, has been for four 
> years now.

If Mozilla is a beta product, why is Netscape not? It's mostly the same 
code.

-- 
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
                                                  -- Benjamin Franklin


Reply via email to